Walsh's Fed Plan to 'Cancel' US Debt: What's Real and What's Hype
Walsh's Fed Plan to 'Cancel' US Debt: What's Real and What's Hype
$39T Debt and the 'Secret Plan'
What worries me more than the $39 trillion debt headline is the interest bill: roughly $1 trillion a year. That's bigger than the US military budget. Bigger than education. It's now the second-largest line item in the federal budget, and about one-fifth of every tax dollar goes straight to servicing yesterday's spending.
Right now social media is flooded with claims that Kevin Walsh — Trump's nominee for the next Fed chair — has a secret plan to cancel that debt. Let me say this plainly: there is no secret. Walsh said this stuff out loud, on the record, in his Senate hearing.
The Four 'Plan' Pieces Going Viral
The viral version distills to four claims:
- Cut rates aggressively
- Shrink the Fed's roughly $7 trillion balance sheet
- AI lifts productivity and pulls inflation down
- May becomes the transition date
The story is being framed as if Walsh walks in, flips a switch, and the debt mountain magically becomes manageable. That's not how this works.
What's Real, What's Hype
Start with what's real. The debt problem is real. The trajectory is, frankly, bananas. Walsh has on the record criticized the Fed's bloated balance sheet and used the phrase 'regime change' to describe what he wants. The historical precedent he draws on is also real — the US fixed a worse debt problem after WWII without defaulting.
Now the hype.
Walsh is one of twelve voters on the FOMC. Yes, the chair carries weight, but he is not a king. The May handover is not guaranteed: Jerome Powell has said he won't leave until the DOJ litigation around him is resolved, and Walsh's confirmation is currently being blocked by Senator Tillis. The '2.7% rate-cut target' floating around the internet is speculation. Walsh has not promised any specific number.
The 'AI saves us from inflation' piece is the shakiest. AI is deflationary if it makes the same things cheaper, but its energy footprint is plainly inflationary, and any large displacement of jobs followed by stimulus checks would be inflationary too. The honest answer is we don't know yet.
The Real Story Underneath
The direction of travel is right. The transition date is wrong.
The US is very likely heading toward a financial repression environment because the math leaves no other path. But it's not a switch in May — it's a slow drift over a decade. How you position for that drift matters far more than which person holds the chair. I worked through the historical playbook in detail in this post on the post-WWII debt reduction.
FAQ
Q: Isn't the Federal Reserve a government agency? A: No. The 12 regional Federal Reserve banks are structured as private corporations. The Ninth Circuit ruled in Lewis v. United States that the Fed banks are "independent, privately-owned, and locally controlled corporations." Member banks hold stock in their regional Fed and collect a statutory 6% annual dividend.
Q: If Walsh becomes chair, do rates fall immediately? A: He's one vote of twelve, and the confirmation itself is currently blocked. Expect a tone shift before any aggressive action.
Q: Could the US actually default on the debt? A: Very unlikely. The US borrows in its own currency. Inflating the dollar's purchasing power away is the politically easier path, and that's the real story behind the headlines.
More in this Category
I Split My 65-Stock Watchlist Into Three Tiers: Why 9%, 12%, and 15% Are Completely Different Decisions
I Split My 65-Stock Watchlist Into Three Tiers: Why 9%, 12%, and 15% Are Completely Different Decisions
Of the 65 names on my watchlist, 37 have moved into my calculation range: 14 project 9-10% annually, 13 project 11-15%, and 10 project above 15%. What separates the tiers isn't business quality — it's today's price.
What It Takes to Buy the Most Hated Stock — Five Arguments and the One Condition That Would Prove Me Wrong
What It Takes to Buy the Most Hated Stock — Five Arguments and the One Condition That Would Prove Me Wrong
Terry Smith is worried about Adobe while Michael Burry, Oakmark, and Mohnish Pabrai are buying it. Here are the five tests I run when smart investors land on opposite sides, plus the falsification condition I write down before I buy.
The Most Violent Momentum Unwind in 45 Years: Why Chip Stocks Crashed While the Index Held Up
The Most Violent Momentum Unwind in 45 Years: Why Chip Stocks Crashed While the Index Held Up
The S&P 500 is up more than 7% for the year and near a record high, while the chip index has fallen about 24% from its June peak. SanDisk -53%, Intel -39%, Micron -32%. Goldman Sachs measured this momentum unwind as the most violent in 45 years.
Next Posts
GE Aerospace Beat Expectations and Still Dropped 5.56% — Here's What Wall Street Saw
GE Aerospace Beat Expectations and Still Dropped 5.56% — Here's What Wall Street Saw
Orders up 87%, revenue up 29%, a record $210B backlog — yet shares fell 5.56% on print day. Held guidance, a cut departures outlook, and 230bp margin compression explain the gap.
Why GE Aerospace Is the Toll Booth of Global Aviation: A 30-Year Razor-and-Blade Anatomy
Why GE Aerospace Is the Toll Booth of Global Aviation: A 30-Year Razor-and-Blade Anatomy
GE powers about 75% of narrow-body and 55% of wide-body flight cycles globally and controls roughly 40% of the engine MRO market. The engine is the razor; three decades of service work is the blade.
GE Aerospace Bull vs Bear: A Framework for Deciding Whether 35x Earnings Is Worth It
GE Aerospace Bull vs Bear: A Framework for Deciding Whether 35x Earnings Is Worth It
Bull case: 95% of next-quarter spare parts revenue locked in, two-thirds of the CFM56 fleet still ahead of its second shop visit. Bear case: 70% spare parts delinquency, double-digit Middle East departure declines, and a 39x forward multiple.
Previous Posts
Big Four AI CapEx in One Year: $300B–$500B and a Build-Out Bigger Than Most Countries' GDP
Big Four AI CapEx in One Year: $300B–$500B and a Build-Out Bigger Than Most Countries' GDP
Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet are deploying $300B–$500B on AI infrastructure in a single year. Amazon alone has committed ~$200B, Microsoft $80B in one fiscal year — bigger than most countries' GDP.
Is AI CapEx the Next AWS or the Next Fiber Optic Bubble — Both Analogies Matter
Is AI CapEx the Next AWS or the Next Fiber Optic Bubble — Both Analogies Matter
The AI CapEx debate is really a fight between two historical analogies — the 1990s fiber optic glut (bears) versus the early-2010s AWS build-out (bulls). Both are partly right; what decides outcomes is the price you pay.
Microsoft at $417 and $3.12T Cap — A Conservative Valuation of the AI Bet
Microsoft at $417 and $3.12T Cap — A Conservative Valuation of the AI Bet
Microsoft trades at $417 with a $3.12T market cap and $77.5B FCF. My conservative valuation (7/9/11% growth, 34/37/40% margin, 20/23/26 terminal multiples) gives a $484 midpoint — about 11% annualized at today's price.