Why I Keep Dollar Cost Averaging at All-Time Highs
Why I Keep Dollar Cost Averaging at All-Time Highs
The Question That Keeps Coming Back
In early April, when the S&P 500 crossed 7,000 for its all-time high, I got the same question from multiple people: "Are you really still dollar cost averaging at the literal all-time high?"
Yes. Without hesitation.
TL;DR The S&P 500 sets new all-time highs over 10 times per year on average in good years. Waiting for a "better price" historically means buying at an even higher price later. Dollar cost averaging works because it removes the emotional impulse to time the market — and that impulse is almost always wrong.
A month later, the S&P 500 is above 7,200. Anyone who waited for a pullback is now facing prices 200 points higher than the "too expensive" level they balked at.
Why Dollar Cost Averaging Works
The S&P 500 hits a new all-time high more than 10 times per year on average during good years.
Once you internalize this fact, the intuition that "all-time high = expensive" starts to collapse. All-time highs aren't anomalies — they're the normal state of a rising market. If your rule is "don't buy at all-time highs," you're systematically sitting out most of the market's best stretches.
The mechanics are straightforward:
- No need to predict market direction
- Eliminates emotional decision-making
- Captures the long-term average cost basis
I invest with my head, not my heart. My gut tells me "it's too high, wait for a dip." The data tells me that waiting usually means buying higher. The data wins every time.
Applying This in Today's Market
The current market presents a genuinely complex backdrop for investors. The S&P 500 is at all-time highs, but significant risks are running in the background:
- The Fed held rates at 3.5–3.75% with virtually no chance of cuts this year
- The Iran situation has pushed gas above $6/gallon in California and diesel past $8
- The ceasefire is temporary — when it ends, volatility could return sharply
This is exactly the environment where dollar cost averaging proves its value. You don't know whether the market goes up or down from here. Nobody does. The strategy works precisely because it doesn't require that knowledge.
What I'm Buying
My focus is on broad-based index ETFs — the three-fund portfolio approach covering US total market, international markets, and bonds. This has been my core strategy regardless of market conditions, and nothing about the current environment changes that.
Individual stocks are a different story. Volatility within the MAG7 alone is extreme — companies are being rewarded or punished based purely on their AI capex levels and perceived monetization path. If prices drop far enough, Microsoft and Amazon are the two I'd consider adding. I'm also researching energy companies and quantum computing stocks.
But the key point: individual positions are satellites, not the core. The core is broad, diversified, and automatic.
Acknowledging the Risks Without Letting Them Paralyze You
I'm cautiously optimistic right now. Earnings were strong across the board. GDP rebounded. AI investment is generating real returns, not just hype. These are legitimate positives.
But thinking "we're past the worst" is premature. The Middle East situation is paused, not resolved. Oil prices at current levels are already a drag on the economy. There's likely more turbulence between now and 2027.
The worst responses to uncertainty are the extremes — going all-in out of FOMO or selling everything out of fear. The right response is sticking to your system. If that system is dollar cost averaging, then you buy this month just like you bought last month and just like you'll buy next month. The price on the screen is irrelevant to the process.
More in this Category
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
In Q2 2026 the S&P 500 jumped ~15% and the Nasdaq ~21%, yet nearly 60% of tech stocks were in a bear market and the semiconductor index rose 82% in 100 trading days. Here's why the market split — and what it reveals about how narratives follow prices.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Next Posts
What Happens When You Invest 20% of Your Paycheck First: The $1.9 Million Gap Between Savers and Automators
What Happens When You Invest 20% of Your Paycheck First: The $1.9 Million Gap Between Savers and Automators
At a $75,000 salary, automating 20% into investments yields $2.47M over 30 years versus $568K from saving the average 4.6% — same income, completely different outcomes.
Why Missing Just 10 Days in 20 Years Can Cut Your Stock Market Returns in Half
Why Missing Just 10 Days in 20 Years Can Cut Your Stock Market Returns in Half
JPMorgan's 20-year S&P 500 study shows that missing the 10 best trading days drops annualized returns from 9.8% to 5.6%, and 7 of those best days occurred within 2 weeks of the worst days.
The Real Difference Between Assets and Liabilities, and the Diversification Trap
The Real Difference Between Assets and Liabilities, and the Diversification Trap
With over $40K in average consumer debt, most Americans confuse liabilities for assets. Real assets put money in your pocket, and real diversification means owning things that move differently — not 5 versions of the S&P 500.
Previous Posts
The 2026 Three-Fund ETF Portfolio: Why VTI, QQQ, and SCHD Replace the Classic Approach
The 2026 Three-Fund ETF Portfolio: Why VTI, QQQ, and SCHD Replace the Classic Approach
The classic Bogleheads three-fund portfolio gets a 2026 upgrade. VTI (anchor) + QQQ (growth) + SCHD (income) equally weighted yields a blended 13.46% appreciation, projecting $10,000 to roughly $560,970 over 30 years.
Fidelity vs Schwab: Why a $100K Index Fund Investment Creates a $1.5 Million Gap Over 30 Years
Fidelity vs Schwab: Why a $100K Index Fund Investment Creates a $1.5 Million Gap Over 30 Years
The same $100,000 invested across Fidelity and Schwab index funds for 30 years produces a $1.5 million difference. Schwab wins S&P 500 by $116,154, but Fidelity dominates total market (+$1.05M), bonds, and international.
3 Paths to $4,000 Monthly Dividend Income: The 27-Year, 17-Year, and 10-Year Routes
3 Paths to $4,000 Monthly Dividend Income: The 27-Year, 17-Year, and 10-Year Routes
Dividend aristocrats (27 years), REITs (17 years), and covered call ETFs (10 years) all reach the same $4,000/month income goal. Starting with $20,000 plus $10/day contributions, the trade-off is time versus risk.