Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
For the investor stuck between selling and holding
Maybe this is you. You own Nvidia, you've made a killing, and part of you wonders whether Michael Burry is right that the chip cycle could take a big fall someday. But selling the whole position right now feels like a waste.
There's a tool built for exactly this in-between spot, one I actually use on my own shares: the covered call.
In one line: a covered call is a strategy where you promise to sell shares you already own, on a specific future date, at a specific higher price, and you collect a cash premium up front for making that promise.
How a covered call works
Here's an example. Say you hold Nvidia near $204 a share and you think, "It might be a little overpriced, but not so overpriced that I want to dump it. If it goes higher, though, I'd gladly get rid of it."
What you can do is sell a call. In the options chain you pick a future expiration, say September 18, 2026, and in the call section you set a strike where you'd be happy to sell, say $250.
Someone will pay you $3.37 per share for that right. Roll that over and over and it adds roughly 8.8% of annual income on top of your shares.
Two outcomes, and neither is bad
On September 18, only two things can happen.
The stock finishes above $250: your shares get called away, but the $3.37 premium is yours. It's as if you sold at $253.37. Since you were willing to sell at that level anyway, that's no loss.
The stock finishes below $250: you keep the shares and you keep the $3.37. You can sell another call at the next expiration.
Either way, the premium stays in your pocket. That's why I describe it as collecting rent on a stock.
If you want to be more aggressive
The lower you set the strike, the bigger the premium, but the higher the odds your shares get sold.
On that same September 18 expiration, drop the strike to $220 and the premium jumps to $10.39 per share. That's effectively selling at $230.39, and if you assume you roll it repeatedly, the annualized return climbs to about 27%. To be clear, that doesn't mean you make 27% in two months, it's the annualized figure if the same setup repeats.
| Expiration | Strike | Premium | Effective sale price | Annualized (if repeated) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 18 | $250 | $3.37 | $253.37 | ~8.8% |
| Sept 18 | $220 | $10.39 | $230.39 | ~27% |
Do it for the right reasons
Here's the one thing I want to stress. Options let you get paid to buy and sell stock, but you have to use them for the right reasons.
A covered call fits when you own the company and you're in that ambivalent state: okay to sell, but not dying to. If the thought of the stock hitting $230 makes you say, "At that price I'd gladly sell," then $230 is your candidate strike.
If, on the other hand, this is a core position you'd never want to sell at any price, a covered call is the wrong fit. You'd be capping your own upside right when a genuine breakout could happen.
A checklist before you sell a call
Here's the order I actually run through:
- Am I truly okay selling at this strike? (I never set a strike at a price I'd regret selling at.)
- Is the premium enough to justify the upside I'm giving up?
- Does this option line up with my long-term view on the name, rather than fighting it?
I only sell the call when all three are yes. Matching the option to your long-term strategy is the whole point.
Wrapping up
Nvidia is a great company that isn't going away. But that fact and what you do in your portfolio this moment are two separate questions. If the buy decision itself is what you're wrestling with, set your buy price first in Nvidia's valuation: what's a fair price.
The covered call is one option for that gray zone between selling and holding, earning cash while you wait. Just don't get seduced by a flashy 27% annualized figure. Always start from the same question: would I really be okay selling at this price?
FAQ
Q: Is a covered call always a win? A: No. You do collect the premium, but if the stock blows past your strike, you give up that upside. In a genuine bull run, that can sting.
Q: Can I sell a call without owning the stock? A: Technically yes, but that's a naked call, not a covered one, and the risk is far greater. The covered call in this piece is only used when you actually hold the shares.
Q: How do I choose the strike? A: Pick a price where you can honestly say, "I'd gladly sell here." If you'd regret selling at your strike, the whole strategy is misaligned.
More in this Category
Meta Drops 10% on Earnings: 28% Revenue Growth Against a 91% Free Cash Flow Collapse
Meta Drops 10% on Earnings: 28% Revenue Growth Against a 91% Free Cash Flow Collapse
Meta posted $60.8 billion in revenue, up 28%, but EPS came in at $6.18 against a $7.15 consensus, and free cash flow fell from over $8.5 billion a year ago to $784 million. My ten-year model puts the midpoint fair value at $925.
Oracle at a 52-Week Low: A $638 Billion Backlog Against Negative Free Cash Flow
Oracle at a 52-Week Low: A $638 Billion Backlog Against Negative Free Cash Flow
Oracle secured a $638 billion backlog (up 363%) and a Department of Defense contract, but free cash flow is negative $23 billion, S&P cut its rating to BBB, and the company is raising $40 billion. My ten-year model puts the midpoint at $200.
I Split My 65-Stock Watchlist Into Three Tiers: Why 9%, 12%, and 15% Are Completely Different Decisions
I Split My 65-Stock Watchlist Into Three Tiers: Why 9%, 12%, and 15% Are Completely Different Decisions
Of the 65 names on my watchlist, 37 have moved into my calculation range: 14 project 9-10% annually, 13 project 11-15%, and 10 project above 15%. What separates the tiers isn't business quality — it's today's price.
Next Posts
Oracle Fell 50% While Its Backlog Grew 363%: Reading the $36B Cash Flow Swing
Oracle Fell 50% While Its Backlog Grew 363%: Reading the $36B Cash Flow Swing
Oracle has been cut in half from roughly $279 a share, yet revenue grew 17% to $67 billion and its signed backlog jumped 363% to $638 billion. What scared the market was not the business — it was a $36 billion swing in free cash flow.
How a Road Builder and an Auto Parts Maker Became AI Infrastructure: Sterling and Modine
How a Road Builder and an Auto Parts Maker Became AI Infrastructure: Sterling and Modine
Data center site work is now about 70% of Sterling Infrastructure's revenue and grew 174% year over year last quarter, while Modine has already locked in more than $4 billion of cooling equipment for 2027 through 2029. Two left-for-dead industrials got a second life from the AI build-out.
The Moment Losses Flip to Profits: Margin Inflections at Lumentum, Credo and Innodata
The Moment Losses Flip to Profits: Margin Inflections at Lumentum, Credo and Innodata
Lumentum's operating margin swung from -25% to +22%, Credo's from -19% to +33%, and Innodata went from a loss to $32 million in profit. With the semiconductor index in a bear market, the signal I track is not growth rates — it is the moment a company crosses into real earnings.
Previous Posts
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
In Q2 2026 the S&P 500 jumped ~15% and the Nasdaq ~21%, yet nearly 60% of tech stocks were in a bear market and the semiconductor index rose 82% in 100 trading days. Here's why the market split — and what it reveals about how narratives follow prices.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
The Buffett indicator is at its highest level in history and the Shiller P/E is above 40 — the second-highest ever. From valuations this stretched, the next decade of returns has historically landed between about +2% and -2% a year. Here's what that means for your money and how to stay invested without overpaying.