Six Numbers to Read Before Selling Any Option: Delta, IV, Cushion and What They Actually Mean
Six Numbers to Read Before Selling Any Option: Delta, IV, Cushion and What They Actually Mean
Selling options is trading probabilities, not predicting prices
Option sellers don't ask "will this stock go up or down?" They ask "what is the probability this stock reaches my strike?" That reframing is the entire game. And once you accept it, the six numbers below stop being jargon and start being the actual decision-making inputs.
1. Delta — reading the success rate backwards
Delta approximates the probability that an option finishes in-the-money. For a put seller, you flip that into:
- Delta 0.10 → ~10% chance of reaching strike → ~90% success rate
- Delta 0.20 → ~20% chance → ~80% success rate
- Delta 0.30 → ~70% success rate, but the premium is much fatter
Conservative traders live in the 0.10–0.15 band. More aggressive sellers run 0.20–0.30. The exchanges compute this number, so the math is reliable.
2. Implied Volatility (IV) — the fuel for premiums
IV is the market's forecast of how much the underlying will move. High IV means the market expects bigger swings, and that inflates premium. Higher IV = bigger paycheck for sellers.
But high IV is also a warning. The market is pricing more movement for a reason. Never read IV alone — always combine it with cushion and delta.
3. Cushion — the real safety net
Cushion is the distance between the current price and your strike. A 27% cushion means the stock has to fall 27% before it even touches your strike. When earnings or other event risk is in the window, this is the last line of defense.
Empirically, top-tier names rarely drop more than 18% on a single earnings miss. A 25%+ cushion absorbs almost all single-event risk on quality tickers.
4. Annualized ROI — putting weeks and months on the same ruler
A 7-day put paying 2% annualizes to roughly 104%. A 30-day put paying 3% annualizes to ~36%. Looking at raw premium, the second one looks bigger. Looking at capital efficiency, the first one is dramatically better. Annualized ROI is the only fair way to rank trades across different durations.
5. Next earnings date — the volatility calendar
IV spikes around earnings and so does premium. Gap risk also spikes. Beginners should usually avoid the two-week window around earnings. But with deeper cushion and only top-tier tickers, the earnings window can also be the most lucrative slot in the year.
6. Composite scores like the Diamond Score
A composite score compresses the previous five into a single number. A score over 5 is a strong sell candidate; below 5 is ordinary. Single-number decisions are dangerous on their own, but composites save a lot of time when you're comparing ten tickers side by side.
How they fit together
Reading the six metrics in isolation is how people get lost. In practice the order goes:
- Cushion — is the strike far enough away?
- Delta — does the success rate match my risk tolerance?
- IV — is the premium juicier than usual?
- Annualized ROI — is the capital lock-up worth it?
- Earnings date — is there an event in this cycle?
- Composite score — how does it rank against the other candidates?
Selling options well isn't betting on one ticker. It's filtering a list down to combinations that match your rules, then rotating capital through them. Once the numbers stop being jargon, the decision becomes mechanical.
More in this Category
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Debt-to-equity across the five AI infrastructure plays spans 31% (Coherent) to 387% (CoreWeave). Here are five rules I use to treat them as tactical trades, not core holds.
The Korean Memory Trio: Three US-Listed Routes Compared (MU vs DRAM ETF vs EWY)
The Korean Memory Trio: Three US-Listed Routes Compared (MU vs DRAM ETF vs EWY)
The real suppliers of AI memory sit in South Korea. Three US-listed ways to capture that exposure — Micron, the DRAM ETF, and EWY — compared on volatility, valuation, and entry zones to help fit each layer into a portfolio.
S&P 500 Prints 7,500 While NAAIM Falls: The Quiet Sell Signal Most Are Missing
S&P 500 Prints 7,500 While NAAIM Falls: The Quiet Sell Signal Most Are Missing
While the S&P 500 sets new highs, the NAAIM exposure index is dropping. With oil near $100 and Beijing news flip-flopping, why this divergence between price and pro positioning is the real warning — and how to slow new deployment.
Next Posts
Coherent Wins — A Six-Round Scorecard for Five AI Infrastructure Stocks
Coherent Wins — A Six-Round Scorecard for Five AI Infrastructure Stocks
I scored Coherent (COHR), CoreWeave (CRWV), Nebius (NBIS), Iren (IREN), and Applied Digital (APLD) across six rounds. Coherent took it with 10 points, driven by the only debt-to-equity ratio under 32%.
We're Still in the First Two Innings — Where the AI Infra Buildout Actually Sits
We're Still in the First Two Innings — Where the AI Infra Buildout Actually Sits
Micron nearly doubled from ~$430 to $818 in 30 days while everyone was calling the top. With Big Tech committing $700B to AI infrastructure, this game is in the first two innings.
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Five Rules for Treating AI Infrastructure Stocks as Tactical, Not Core
Debt-to-equity across the five AI infrastructure plays spans 31% (Coherent) to 387% (CoreWeave). Here are five rules I use to treat them as tactical trades, not core holds.
Previous Posts
Magnificent Seven Six-Round Face-Off: Why Nvidia Swept All 18 Points
Magnificent Seven Six-Round Face-Off: Why Nvidia Swept All 18 Points
Ranking the Mag 7 across six financial metrics produced a clean sweep for Nvidia at a perfect 18 points, while Tesla limped in with 1 and Amazon scored zero. The valuation gap is the real story.
Nvidia Fundamentals Decoded: What 55.6% Margins and 69.5% Revenue Growth Actually Mean
Nvidia Fundamentals Decoded: What 55.6% Margins and 69.5% Revenue Growth Actually Mean
Nvidia swept all six rounds of the Mag 7 face-off because it leads simultaneously on margins, growth, capital efficiency, free cash flow, valuation efficiency, and balance sheet strength. The combined picture explains why the AI #1 narrative is more than marketing.
Do Tesla and Amazon Still Deserve a Place in the Magnificent Seven?
Do Tesla and Amazon Still Deserve a Place in the Magnificent Seven?
Tesla scored 1 point. Amazon scored 0. The most uncomfortable finding from a Mag 7 fundamentals face-off isn't Nvidia's sweep at the top — it's the structural gap at the bottom. Worth asking whether the label still earns the premium it implies.