Surviving the Inflation Tax: A 3-Step Positioning Framework
Surviving the Inflation Tax: A 3-Step Positioning Framework
Surviving the Inflation Tax: A 3-Step Framework
Step 1 — Look at the Real Risk
Most people watch the wrong risk. US default? Practically zero. The US borrows in its own currency, so a traditional default isn't on the menu.
The real risk is the dollar losing purchasing power over the next 10 to 20 years. The number in your account will look the same. It just won't buy what it used to.
Which means the way you measure wealth has to change. Stop measuring in dollars. Measure in what those dollars can buy.
- How many ounces of gold can you buy?
- What fraction of a median home can you buy?
- How many shares of the S&P 500 can you buy?
Reframe the last three years through that lens: the US stock market is up roughly 75% over that period. If you sat on $100 in cash the whole time, the amount of S&P you can now buy with that $100 has shrunk to roughly a quarter of what it was. In dollar terms it's still $100. In asset terms it's been gutted.
Step 2 — Position for Repression
In an environment where the dollar weakens, you want to own things that don't weaken with it. Two big buckets.
High-quality stocks with pricing power. Companies that can raise prices when their costs rise — meaning their position is strong enough that customers don't walk away when prices go up. Inflation squeezes margins, but these businesses can pass the squeeze through to customers.
Hard assets. Gold, silver, real estate. The point is assets with non-engineered scarcity. Genuinely rare baseball cards, true luxury collectibles, parts of the art market — same bucket.
A piece of advice you'll hear a lot is 'diversify internationally.' Honestly, it doesn't help much. The same monetary dynamic is unfolding in Europe, in Asia, almost everywhere at once. Spreading across currencies doesn't get you out of the inflation tax.
Step 3 — Avoid Four Traps
Avoidance matters more than selection.
Trap 1: Loading up on long-duration bonds. Locking in today's rate feels safe. But if inflation runs hotter than expected, the real value of that bond stream collapses. People walked into this exact trap in the 1970s.
Trap 2: 'I'll just hold cash because I'm uncertain.' The most common, the most expensive. Cash is not safe in this regime. Cash is a certain loss.
Trap 3: Concentration. 'AI is the answer.' 'Gold is the answer.' 'Real estate is the answer.' 'Crypto is the answer.' Going all-in on one square is the fastest way to get wrecked.
Trap 4: Doing nothing. The most expensive choice you can make. 'I don't know if my allocation is right, so I'll leave it alone' is itself a decision, and inflation sends the bill.
The metaphor I keep coming back to: the market is a chessboard, and money moves from one square to another. It doesn't disappear. It just relocates. The people who stay on the same square slowly shrink in real terms.
Anchor Back to the Why
For the historical playbook America has used before, see how the US cut its debt from 106% to 23% of GDP. For the current headlines around the next Fed chair, see the Walsh Fed plan reality check.
The principle is simple. Drift toward owning things. Don't lean too hard in any one direction. And remember — not deciding is itself a decision, and this is the regime that makes you pay for it.
More in this Category
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
The Buffett indicator is at its highest level in history and the Shiller P/E is above 40 — the second-highest ever. From valuations this stretched, the next decade of returns has historically landed between about +2% and -2% a year. Here's what that means for your money and how to stay invested without overpaying.
Next Posts
GE Aerospace Beat Expectations and Still Dropped 5.56% — Here's What Wall Street Saw
GE Aerospace Beat Expectations and Still Dropped 5.56% — Here's What Wall Street Saw
Orders up 87%, revenue up 29%, a record $210B backlog — yet shares fell 5.56% on print day. Held guidance, a cut departures outlook, and 230bp margin compression explain the gap.
Why GE Aerospace Is the Toll Booth of Global Aviation: A 30-Year Razor-and-Blade Anatomy
Why GE Aerospace Is the Toll Booth of Global Aviation: A 30-Year Razor-and-Blade Anatomy
GE powers about 75% of narrow-body and 55% of wide-body flight cycles globally and controls roughly 40% of the engine MRO market. The engine is the razor; three decades of service work is the blade.
GE Aerospace Bull vs Bear: A Framework for Deciding Whether 35x Earnings Is Worth It
GE Aerospace Bull vs Bear: A Framework for Deciding Whether 35x Earnings Is Worth It
Bull case: 95% of next-quarter spare parts revenue locked in, two-thirds of the CFM56 fleet still ahead of its second shop visit. Bear case: 70% spare parts delinquency, double-digit Middle East departure declines, and a 39x forward multiple.
Previous Posts
Big Four AI CapEx in One Year: $300B–$500B and a Build-Out Bigger Than Most Countries' GDP
Big Four AI CapEx in One Year: $300B–$500B and a Build-Out Bigger Than Most Countries' GDP
Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet are deploying $300B–$500B on AI infrastructure in a single year. Amazon alone has committed ~$200B, Microsoft $80B in one fiscal year — bigger than most countries' GDP.
Is AI CapEx the Next AWS or the Next Fiber Optic Bubble — Both Analogies Matter
Is AI CapEx the Next AWS or the Next Fiber Optic Bubble — Both Analogies Matter
The AI CapEx debate is really a fight between two historical analogies — the 1990s fiber optic glut (bears) versus the early-2010s AWS build-out (bulls). Both are partly right; what decides outcomes is the price you pay.
Microsoft at $417 and $3.12T Cap — A Conservative Valuation of the AI Bet
Microsoft at $417 and $3.12T Cap — A Conservative Valuation of the AI Bet
Microsoft trades at $417 with a $3.12T market cap and $77.5B FCF. My conservative valuation (7/9/11% growth, 34/37/40% margin, 20/23/26 terminal multiples) gives a $484 midpoint — about 11% annualized at today's price.