Why Netflix Stock Fell While the Business Kept Winning
Why Netflix Stock Fell While the Business Kept Winning
The stock fell, but the business kept winning
Netflix has slid all the way back to its February lows, and if you own it, the last stretch has felt exactly like the drop on a roller coaster. So let me start with the distinction that matters most: this is not a “the business is broken” story. It’s a “the stock got too expensive and expectations got too high” story. Those are two very different things, and the second one is what patient investors actually hope to see.
Here’s what the business did in its most recent quarter:
| Metric | Latest quarter | Change YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.15B | +16% |
| Operating income | — | +18% |
| Operating margin | ~32% | rising |
| Free cash flow | $5B+ | one-time boosted |
Those are strong, phenomenal numbers. So the fall wasn’t about the fundamentals falling apart. It was about four things colliding at once.
Reason one: expectations were priced for perfection
The biggest reason, by far. Netflix had become a Wall Street darling again, and the stock was priced for near-perfection — meaning everything had to go right just to justify where it traded. When a stock sits that high, good results aren’t good enough; investors want a blowout. Netflix delivered strong numbers but did not raise its full-year forecast, and on Wall Street a strong-but-not-raised quarter reads as a letdown. The stock got punished for it.
Reason two: the easy growth is fading
Growth is still there — just slower. Netflix guided to roughly 13% revenue growth next quarter, down from 16%. A big part of the reason is that the password-sharing crackdown, which was a massive one-time tailwind, is running out. Net new members came in at 23 million in 2025, down from 41 million the year before. That naturally invites the question every shareholder is asking: where does the next wave of growth come from?
Reason three: the Warner Bros. drama
Netflix spent months chasing Warner Bros. Discovery, and investors got nervous — about the price, about regulators, and about whether Netflix was drifting away from the simple, money-printing streaming model that made it great. In the end, Netflix refused to overpay and walked away. The market actually respected that discipline, but the whole saga left a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the stock for months.
One important footnote: that $5 billion in quarterly free cash flow included roughly $2 billion from a Warner Bros. breakup fee. Strip it out and you’re at about $3 billion — still a monster number, but be honest with yourself about what’s recurring and what isn’t. I’d take the one-time money out before I value anything.
Reason four: messy short-term optics
Netflix spends billions producing shows, and the way that cost is recognized bounces around quarter to quarter depending on when big titles launch. This particular stretch happens to be a heavier cost period, so margins dip a little in the short term even though the company still expects full-year margins to grow. It’s a great long-term story with messy short-term optics — and, as Mohnish Pabrai likes to say, the market hates uncertainty. I’d go one step further: it’s speculators who hate messy. Long-term owners can look straight through it.
What I’m actually watching
Stack it all together — slowing member adds, a fast-growing but still-small ad business, renewed competition from YouTube, Amazon and Disney, and even founder Reed Hastings stepping off the board — and nervous investors had plenty of reasons to sell. None of those is a disaster on its own.
But here’s the fact I want you to hold onto: while the stock was falling, the business kept winning. Full-year revenue topped $45 billion, up 16% from 2024, and the profit margin rose a full three points. The stock went down; the company went up. As Peter Lynch always said, there’s nothing better than a company’s stock price falling while its fundamentals are getting better. That gap is exactly what’s worth measuring — which is what I dig into when I lay out the bull and bear cases and then run the actual numbers.
More in this Category
Sales Exploding, Stock Stuck: The Complete Nvidia Bull vs Bear Case
Sales Exploding, Stock Stuck: The Complete Nvidia Bull vs Bear Case
Nvidia's revenue rocketed from $16B in 2021 to $253B in under five years, yet the stock has trailed AMD and Micron. Here's my read on Jensen Huang's 'parabolic demand' claim, the three bull cases, and the three bear cases.
Nvidia's Valuation: What's a Fair Price to Pay Right Now
Nvidia's Valuation: What's a Fair Price to Pay Right Now
A $5 trillion market cap, a 19.6x price-to-sales ratio, and a 63% one-year net margin. Running a conservative 10-year model (10-25% revenue growth, 35-55% margins), I get a mid fair value of $250 at a 9% required return, and $154 at my personal 15%.
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
Next Posts
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
In Q2 2026 the S&P 500 jumped ~15% and the Nasdaq ~21%, yet nearly 60% of tech stocks were in a bear market and the semiconductor index rose 82% in 100 trading days. Here's why the market split — and what it reveals about how narratives follow prices.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
The Buffett indicator is at its highest level in history and the Shiller P/E is above 40 — the second-highest ever. From valuations this stretched, the next decade of returns has historically landed between about +2% and -2% a year. Here's what that means for your money and how to stay invested without overpaying.
Previous Posts
My Personal Magnificent 7 Is Down 34 Points to the Mag 7 — and I Couldn't Be Calmer
My Personal Magnificent 7 Is Down 34 Points to the Mag 7 — and I Couldn't Be Calmer
In early 2025 I built a 'personal Magnificent 7' from seven overlooked, undervalued stocks instead of the real Mag 7. Eighteen months in, the Mag 7 is up 20% while my basket is down 14% — a 34-point gap — and here's why that doesn't move me.
Three Undervalued Retail Stocks the Market Keeps Missing — Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike
Three Undervalued Retail Stocks the Market Keeps Missing — Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike
Recession-resistant beauty leader Ulta at 16x free cash flow, private-label-driven grocer Sprouts, and Nike down over 80% from its peak. Three brick-and-mortar names dismissed as boring — but each has high returns on capital and a real brand moat.
The News Is Following the Price — Four Contrarian Stocks: PayPal, Alibaba, Adobe, and Southwest
The News Is Following the Price — Four Contrarian Stocks: PayPal, Alibaba, Adobe, and Southwest
PayPal at 7.5x free cash flow with Michael Burry buying, Alibaba down ~50% from its highs, Adobe down 44% despite six straight record-revenue quarters, and Southwest, profitable for 48 years. All four contrarian names project 20%+ annualized returns on my middle-case assumptions.