My Personal Magnificent 7 Is Down 34 Points to the Mag 7 — and I Couldn't Be Calmer
My Personal Magnificent 7 Is Down 34 Points to the Mag 7 — and I Couldn't Be Calmer
TL;DR In early 2025 I built a 'personal Magnificent 7' out of seven overlooked, undervalued names instead of the real Mag 7. A year and a half later the Mag 7 is up 20% and my basket is down 14% — a 34-point gap. I'm completely fine with it, because in the short run the market is a voting machine and in the long run it's a weighing machine.
I bet directly against the market's favorite story
While everyone obsessed over the Magnificent 7 in early 2025, I took the other side.
Instead of the so-called market leaders, I picked seven under-the-radar names — Ulta Beauty, Southwest Airlines, PayPal, Alibaba, Adobe, Nike, and Sprouts Farmers Market. Nothing hyped, nothing inflated. Just businesses that struck me as smart and undervalued, the kind the market keeps missing.
And from day one I set a rule: I'd track these picks quarter by quarter and compare them head-to-head against the Mag 7 and the broader market. This piece is that scoreboard, kept honestly.
The scoreboard: what's happened so far
Let me give you the numbers straight — I'm losing.
- Last quarter: the real Mag 7 made 11%, my basket lost 3%
- First half of this year: Mag 7 down 2%, my basket down 19%
- Since the start of 2025: Mag 7 up 20%, my basket down 14% (a 34-point relative gap)
The individual swings are wilder. Southwest hit a high of +52%, Adobe a low of -52%. Alibaba was up 120% at one point and was really driving my returns — that same stock is now up just 17%. That's how fast things flip.
Here's what's interesting about the path, though. For a big chunk of the first quarter this year I was actually ahead of the Mag 7. Then the market bottomed, the Nasdaq took off, and the momentum-heavy megacaps ran on an index basis. When tech is ripping like that, I knew I'd get my butt kicked. I'm okay with it.
Short run, voting machine. Long run, weighing machine.
The reason I don't flinch fits in one Benjamin Graham line.
In the short run the market is a voting machine; in the long run it's a weighing machine.
I don't care about month-to-month or even year-to-year results. I care about one thing: do the businesses I own have good prospects, and can I buy them at a reasonable price today? I'm looking at the next 5, 10, 15 years and beyond.
So many people say they're long-term investors and then get upset over a bad quarter. It makes no sense. If you bought your neighbor's business outright, would you sell it tomorrow because the quoted price dipped — even though the business itself got better? Of course not. A publicly traded stock is no different.
Even when I was beating the Mag 7 in the first half of last year, I didn't change my tone or take a victory lap. I told people to pump the brakes because it was far too early. It still is.
Fang → Mag 7 → Mangoes, and whatever's next
There's one more thing that proves my whole point: Wall Street has already started chasing the next acronym.
The Mag 7 originally replaced 'Fang.' Now that the Mag 7 is wobbling, Wall Street is hyping a new group called 'Mangoes' — Meta, Anthropic, Nvidia, Google, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Some are terrific companies. But here's the punchline: two of the six, Anthropic and OpenAI, aren't even publicly traded. You literally cannot buy a third of the list.
Fang, then Mag 7, now Mangoes. When people got sick of Fang, we said they'd eventually get sick of the Mag 7 too — and here we are. There's always a new hot list to chase. Chasing hype isn't a strategy; it's how people buy high and get burned.
I pick on one thing only: price versus value
I don't buy what's popular this month. I buy on price relative to value — full stop.
Let me be blunt: you should never own a stock just because someone on the internet, or even Warren Buffett, owns it. The point here isn't to hand you a pick. It's to show you a process — to teach you to fish so you can sleep at night.
For my seven to trail the Mag 7 this badly, it took a massive bull market and a lot of hype breaking exactly right. Flip that around: with all those tailwinds, the Mag 7 only opened this much of a gap. I just need my businesses to grow naturally from here. I'll keep posting this scoreboard every quarter.
I broke down exactly what I own, and why, in two follow-ups: three undervalued retail names — Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike, and four contrarian stocks where the news is following the price.
More in this Category
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
In Q2 2026 the S&P 500 jumped ~15% and the Nasdaq ~21%, yet nearly 60% of tech stocks were in a bear market and the semiconductor index rose 82% in 100 trading days. Here's why the market split — and what it reveals about how narratives follow prices.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Next Posts
Why Netflix Stock Fell While the Business Kept Winning
Why Netflix Stock Fell While the Business Kept Winning
Netflix fell back to its February lows even as it grew revenue 16% to $12.15B and pushed operating margin to ~32% — here’s why the stock dropped and why that gap between price and fundamentals matters.
Netflix Bull Case vs. Bear Case: Three Arguments on Each Side
Netflix Bull Case vs. Bear Case: Three Arguments on Each Side
Three honest bull cases — default global TV, a booming ad engine, and pricing power plus a $31.8B buyback — squared off against three bear cases: fading growth, sharper competition, and a price still built for perfection.
What Is Netflix Worth? A Ten-Year Model and My Buy Discipline
What Is Netflix Worth? A Ten-Year Model and My Buy Discipline
A ten-year Netflix model — 6–10% revenue growth, normalized 20–26% margins, a 20–26x exit multiple, discounted at 9% — lands intrinsic value near $74, but a 15% return hurdle means I only buy around $50.
Previous Posts
Micron's $41.5B Blowout: Revenue Up 346% and What Comes Next
Micron's $41.5B Blowout: Revenue Up 346% and What Comes Next
Micron just posted $41.5B in quarterly revenue, up 346% year over year — the best quarter in its 47-year history. Gross margin jumped from 39% to 85%, the market cap cleared $1.3 trillion, and roughly $100B in long-term contracts is now locked in.
Micron Bulls vs Bears: Is the Memory Boom-Bust Cycle Really Over?
Micron Bulls vs Bears: Is the Memory Boom-Bust Cycle Really Over?
I pit three bull cases against three bear cases on Micron — AI memory demand and $100B in signed contracts versus the industry's recurring glut cycle and the risk that AI won't need premium HBM forever.
What Is Micron Actually Worth? I Ran the Bull and Bear Numbers
What Is Micron Actually Worth? I Ran the Bull and Bear Numbers
I calculated Micron's fair value under two 10-year scenarios — a bull midpoint near $3,900 and a bear midpoint near $670. When the gap is that wide, here's why even Warren Buffett would pass.