Will Robotaxis Kill Uber? The Market Is Afraid of the Wrong Thing
Will Robotaxis Kill Uber? The Market Is Afraid of the Wrong Thing
Will robotaxis bring Uber down?
My answer is no. The market is afraid Uber will be disrupted by self-driving cars; I think Uber becomes the platform those cars run on. And while everyone worries, the company is posting record operating income and roughly $10 billion in free cash flow.
Uber has sat near its 52-week lows for a while now. Read the headlines and the reason is obvious: people fear that self-driving cars are coming and Uber becomes irrelevant.
I understand the concern. But what's actually happening inside the business tells a different story.
Point 1: This is not a dying business
Start with the headline: over the past year Uber posted record operating income and about $10 billion in free cash flow.
Those are not the numbers of a dying company. They're the numbers of a growing one the market is mispricing out of fear. I remember when the CEO said, "The market cares about free cash flow now — we're going to grow it." And you can see it: quarterly FCF dipped, then turned back up. That doesn't guarantee the future — robotaxis are a real threat — but the question is what Uber is doing to meet that threat and keep growing.
Point 2: Uber becomes the platform, not the roadkill
Here's the picture I see in the robotaxi narrative: Uber doesn't get disrupted — it partners.
It already has a relationship with Waymo and is building more autonomous-vehicle partnerships, so self-driving fleets plug directly into Uber's network. Think about that — Uber becomes the platform autonomous vehicles run on. That's not a threat; it's an opportunity.
Point 3: It's no longer a "rides + delivery" company
Uber is becoming something much larger than rides and food delivery.
Uber One, its subscription service, just crossed 50 million members. Its in-app advertising business is running at $2 billion a year, and it now books hotels. The company is turning into something far bigger — while the stock lingers near its lows.
Uber by the numbers
Market cap around $150 billion, enterprise value about $178 billion — that $28 billion gap is debt. But last year's $10 billion in free cash flow makes it manageable.
Returns on capital aren't great right now, but they're improving fast: negative over the last five years, then 8.36% last year. Same story on margins — a five-year average of 6.5%, but 16% last year. Uber has spent only about $1.5 billion on acquisitions over five years, and revenue grew 17% a year over three years and 38% a year over five. The P/E is around 15.
Honestly, a company like this is harder to model. The history is short and still improving, so it's tough to pick the "right" inputs. Still, here's what I used for the next ten years: revenue growth of 4/7/10% (roughly doubling each decade), net margin and FCF of 18/22/26%, a P/E ten years out of 18/22/26, and a 9% required return. Uber hasn't hit most of those margins yet, but as it leans harder into profit and cash flow, there's room to get there.
Run that and I get a low of $85, a high of $255, and a midpoint of $150, with a potential return around 19%. For balance: analyst earnings estimates aren't great — about $3.13 per share growing to $5 over the next five to seven years — while revenue nearly doubles from $60 billion to $105 billion over seven years. That gap is the thing to watch on this name.
Getting paid to wait
I don't just wait for Uber to reach my price. I sell cash-secured puts.
Say Uber is around $73 and I want it at $65. Selling a put about a month out at a $65 strike, someone pays me nearly $1 per share. Repeat that every month and it's roughly a 16.8% annual cash yield. If Uber drops to $65 or below, I buy at $65 and keep my $1 — effectively paying $64. If it stays above $65, I keep the premium and don't get the shares. Either way, I win.
FAQ
Q: If self-driving cars go mainstream, don't Uber's drivers disappear and the business collapse? A: Uber is treating autonomy as a partner, not an enemy. Working with Waymo and others, it's making autonomous fleets run on the Uber network. Shifting from a driver-based model to "the platform autonomous vehicles run on" turns the threat into an opportunity.
Q: Is Uber cheap right now? A: At a P/E of 15, with record operating income and about $10 billion in FCF, I think it's an attractive zone. My model's midpoint fair value is $150, with a potential return near 19%. That said, analyst earnings estimates are conservative, and the short operating history makes the future assumptions genuinely uncertain.
Q: What kind of company is Uber now? A: Not just ride-hailing and food delivery. It's expanding into a platform spanning subscriptions (Uber One's 50 million members), in-app advertising ($2 billion a year), and even hotel booking.
The point is always the same: it's not what you buy, it's what you pay. I think Uber is a good business — but I only buy it when the price makes sense.
More in this Category
Sales Exploding, Stock Stuck: The Complete Nvidia Bull vs Bear Case
Sales Exploding, Stock Stuck: The Complete Nvidia Bull vs Bear Case
Nvidia's revenue rocketed from $16B in 2021 to $253B in under five years, yet the stock has trailed AMD and Micron. Here's my read on Jensen Huang's 'parabolic demand' claim, the three bull cases, and the three bear cases.
Nvidia's Valuation: What's a Fair Price to Pay Right Now
Nvidia's Valuation: What's a Fair Price to Pay Right Now
A $5 trillion market cap, a 19.6x price-to-sales ratio, and a 63% one-year net margin. Running a conservative 10-year model (10-25% revenue growth, 35-55% margins), I get a mid fair value of $250 at a 9% required return, and $154 at my personal 15%.
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
Getting Paid to Hold Nvidia: Understanding the Covered Call
If you're torn between selling Nvidia and holding it, a covered call can be the answer. Selling a Sept 18 $250 call pays about $3.37 per share (roughly 8.8% annualized); a $220 call pays $10.39 (about 27%). Here's how it works and where it bites.
Next Posts
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
The Great 2026 Market Split: Memory Chips Went Parabolic While Tech Quietly Fell Into a Bear Market
In Q2 2026 the S&P 500 jumped ~15% and the Nasdaq ~21%, yet nearly 60% of tech stocks were in a bear market and the semiconductor index rose 82% in 100 trading days. Here's why the market split — and what it reveals about how narratives follow prices.
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Smart Money vs Wall Street: Burry, Buffett and Grantham Are Cautious While Goldman Targets S&P 8,000
Michael Burry is shorting Nvidia and Micron while buying hated value names; Buffett is sitting on nearly $400 billion in cash. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both target S&P 8,000 by year-end. Here's both cases at full strength — and the 1999 quotes that should give bulls pause.
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
Should You Buy Stocks at All-Time Highs? What Valuations Actually Say About the Next 10 Years
The Buffett indicator is at its highest level in history and the Shiller P/E is above 40 — the second-highest ever. From valuations this stretched, the next decade of returns has historically landed between about +2% and -2% a year. Here's what that means for your money and how to stay invested without overpaying.
Previous Posts
My Personal Magnificent 7 Is Down 34 Points to the Mag 7 — and I Couldn't Be Calmer
My Personal Magnificent 7 Is Down 34 Points to the Mag 7 — and I Couldn't Be Calmer
In early 2025 I built a 'personal Magnificent 7' from seven overlooked, undervalued stocks instead of the real Mag 7. Eighteen months in, the Mag 7 is up 20% while my basket is down 14% — a 34-point gap — and here's why that doesn't move me.
Three Undervalued Retail Stocks the Market Keeps Missing — Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike
Three Undervalued Retail Stocks the Market Keeps Missing — Ulta, Sprouts, and Nike
Recession-resistant beauty leader Ulta at 16x free cash flow, private-label-driven grocer Sprouts, and Nike down over 80% from its peak. Three brick-and-mortar names dismissed as boring — but each has high returns on capital and a real brand moat.
The News Is Following the Price — Four Contrarian Stocks: PayPal, Alibaba, Adobe, and Southwest
The News Is Following the Price — Four Contrarian Stocks: PayPal, Alibaba, Adobe, and Southwest
PayPal at 7.5x free cash flow with Michael Burry buying, Alibaba down ~50% from its highs, Adobe down 44% despite six straight record-revenue quarters, and Southwest, profitable for 48 years. All four contrarian names project 20%+ annualized returns on my middle-case assumptions.